A few weeks ago we talked about
Israel's destruction by Assyria. Judah lasted another few generations, but
ultimately did not learn their lesson and God allowed them to be taken into
captivity by Babylon. Babylon's strategy was different than Assyria's and was
even smarter. They indoctrinated the best and smartest people from these
conquered nations and made them loyal to Babylon.
As we read this week’s chapter
we see this on the very first page.
What is actually happening here is clash of worldviews; a cultural
war. This is important to see
because in so many ways we are engaged in the same war. The secular worldview
and the Christian worldview are in many ways at odds with each other. Clearly,
the surface details are different, but the goals and tactics are eerily
similar.
It says on page 249 that Babylonian
officials took the Jewish captives and taught them the language and literature
of Babylon and that they were given Babylonian food to eat. They basically give
the best of the best a free ride to Babylon University and in the course of
time hope to win their hearts over as well.
The strategy here may not jump out at you, but realize what they are actually doing is waging this war of worldviews on three different battlefronts.
Hi, I'm cool. |
The strategy here may not jump out at you, but realize what they are actually doing is waging this war of worldviews on three different battlefronts.
1.
Mental front. They knew if
they could get them to stop thinking and talking like Israelites then they
would more likely be loyal to Babylon.
So they re-taught them to speak. Renamed things and changed the way they
thought and spoke about things. There is an identical strategy in the culture
war we face. There has been a mass effort to change language and thinking
towards most of life, especially things that are unacceptable in the Christian
worldview. Sins are not sins, they are character flaws, conditions, identify
quarks or something else that lessons the negative feel of the particular
thing. Or, in some cases where
there is no way to rename a thing to make it sound better, culture just says
there is nothing wrong with that thing at all. Disobedience to God's word becomes
a matter of free choice and saying anything negative towards that
"thing" is hateful, closed minded, intolerant, old fashioned, archaic,
stifling, etc.
2.
Cultural front. They replaced
Israel's history and Israel's story with Babylon's history and stories. This is
part of reshaping identify and worldview. A culture's story is one of the most
unifying things and results in loyalty. So Babylon said, "Here, instead of
reading those old fables and fairy tales why don't you read what really
happened in history. Noah? No, it was Gilgamesh. Yahweh created the world? No.
Apsu and Mummu-Tiamet merged and begot all that is." and so on. The same strategy is in play today
where secular culture seeks to replace the biblical history and the story of
God's people with its own history. It is common to pick up on a condescending
tone as this happens; “You
believe in those Bible stories? Awww, that’s cute…but dumb. Let me tell you what really
is the case.”
3.
Lastly this was a moral
battle. Giving them food from the king's table doesn't sound horrible. In fact
it seems nice. Giving captives food from the king's table sounds very generous.
That's a way of saying they were given distinctly Babylonian foods. As Jews
they had the Law of Moses that forbid eating certain things. The issue there
wasn't that certain foods are somehow evil or wrong. That was just one of the
ways God told Israel to set themselves apart. Having these dietary requirements
was simply one of the things that set Israel apart as God's covenant people.
Nonetheless, at this time that was what God wanted from them. Now the
Babylonians set these foods in front of them and say, "come on, these foods
are better. If you eat then you will be better and stronger and accepted."
The choice in front of them was do I keep basing my view of what's right and
wrong on God's word, or on what everyone around me is doing? Do I really need
to explain how that mentality is till active today?
That is the way Babylon replaced
other worldviews with their own, and it is the way the world tries to replace
the biblical worldview with its own. The typical Christian approach to this
worldview war is to build a safe bubble of Christianity to live in. Some people
want to remove themselves from the big bad scary world so that there is no risk
of my worldview being challenged or being tainted by the world. However, this
is not the story of how some Hebrews built a bubble around themselves. This is
the story of how some Hebrews learned to live in culture in a way that was
faithful to God and drew people to him.
4 Hebrews: Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael
and Azariah are taken to Babylon because they were exceptional people.
I think Jesus followers should be
experts in various fields. Why is it such a rarity and such a huge story when
someone who rises to the top of a particular group happens to be a devoted
Christian (*cough* Tebow *cough*)? Jon Jones is a great example. He is literally
the best of the best in a very unexpected field, cage fighting, and he is a
genuine follower of Jesus. That’s
wonderful, but why is it so rare and shocking? Shouldn’t followers
of Jesus be among the best of the best in every field? After all, we are representing
Jesus to the world and we often make Jesus look lazy.
One of
the edge of your seat/white knuckle/don’t get up to go to the bathroom until
this scene is over parts of this when Nebuchadnezzar starts thinking he’s better
than Bieber and has a giant statue of himself made. After ordering everyone to
worship the statue he finds out Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego are not singing
along. One of the most amazing parts of this story in my opinion is the response
the 3 Hebrews gave to King Neby when he says, “sing to my statue or die in my
furnace.” They say “O King Nebuchadnezzar, we not need to give an answer for
ourselves. We know that our God can rescue us from the fire. But even if he
doesn’t, you should know we won’t serve your gods or worship your statue.”
AMAZING! Here’s my version of that response: “Silly King. Our God can do
anything, even the seemingly impossible. He can keep us alive in your fire. But
even if he chooses not to, he is still God you are still not.”
How does that great statement of faith affect our lives? How do we apply this? This is made real in our world as we stay faithful in the face of pain, suffering, doubt and confusing situations. Do we have the kind of faith that does not remove God from his throne when things hurt? The 3 Hebrews did not know for sure God was going to rescue them. For all they knew God could’ve chosen not to rescue them, and yet they retained faith that God is good and powerful and worthy of worship. How often does our faith depend on whether or not the genie in the sky has been coming through lately or not? When things are great God is awesome. When things are rough God has forgotten. I want their kind of faith. I want my prayer to be, “God, I know you are able to heal me/rescue me/provide for me/fix this situation, but even if you choose not to you are still a wonderful God worthy of worship.” May we all have this kind of faith that acknowledges that God is caring enough to be aware of every situation we face, that he is powerful enough to change any situation, and that he is also sovereign enough to decide which prayers he answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment